A battle supreme
Dems, civil rights groups and others gearing up for confirmation fight over U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh
Free Press staff, wire reports | 7/12/2018, noon
Judge Kavanaugh would not immediately change the ideological breakdown of a court that already has a 5-4 conservative majority, but nevertheless could move the court to the right. Justice Kennedy sometimes joined the liberal justices on key rulings on such social issues like abortion and gay rights, a practice his replacement may not duplicate.
Judge Kavanaugh has amassed a solidly conservative judicial record since 2006 with the 300 opinions he has written since joining the D.C. court, the same court on which three current justices previously served, including Chief Justice John Roberts.
“My judicial philosophy is straightforward: A judge must be independent and must interpret the law, not make the law,” Judge Kavanaugh said after accepting the nomination Monday at the White House.
“A judge must interpret statutes as written. And a judge must interpret the Constitution as written, informed by history and tradition and precedent,” he said in remarks in which he also talked about his family and emphasized his Roman Catholic faith.
Judge Kavanaugh survived a three-year confirmation fight to get on the appeals court.
Opponents are hoping Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska will help block his confirmation. Sens. Collins and Murkowski support abortion rights and plan to carefully vet Judge Kavanaugh’s views on women’s rights.
Meanwhile, Republicans are hoping for votes of support from several Democratic senators facing re-election this year in Republican-leaning states, including Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota.
The new justice can be expected to cast crucial votes on matters of national importance including gay rights, gun control, the death penalty and voting rights.
The court could also be called upon to render judgment on issues of personal significance to President Trump and his administration, including matters arising from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing Russia-related investigation and several civil lawsuits pending against President Trump.
People are now combing through his opinions, which have a consistent business-first, citizens-last ring, according to legal scholars.
For example, Judge Kavanaugh faulted Obama-era environmental regulations, including upholding a coal company’s challenge to emissions policies aimed at fighting climate change.
In 2016, he wrote the appeals court decision that found unconstitutional the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was formed under President Obama to stop banks and other powerful corporations from gouging ordinary people.
In 2011, he dissented as the court upheld a District of Columbia gun law that banned semi-automatic rifles, opining that such weapons of war are open to citizen ownership under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment
Last October, he was part of a panel of judges that issued an order preventing a 17-year-old undocumented immigrant detained in Texas by U.S. authorities from immediately obtaining an abortion. That decision was overturned by the full appeals court, and she had the abortion.
Judge Kavanaugh wrote in a dissent that the full court was embracing “a new right for unlawful immigrant minors in U.S. government detention to obtain immediate abortion on demand.”