‘Defunding police’ rejected
Richmond City Council kills proposal to examine police funding in social, mental health and community services and move the money to other departments
Jeremy M. Lazarus | 7/30/2020, 6 p.m.
No to reducing the Richmond Police budget to assuage demonstrators’ demands to “defund police.”
Yes to the demand to develop a mental health alert system named for Marcus-David Peters, the
24-year-old high school biology teacher whom a Richmond Police officer fatally shot in 2018 as Mr. Peters charged and threatened him while experiencing what has been described as a mental crisis.
Yes to another demand for an independent civilian review board with subpoena power to consider complaints against police officers for use of excessive force.
That was the response of Richmond City Council on Monday night amid the ongoing protests and demonstrations sparked by the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd during his May 25 arrest for allegedly passing a phony $20 bill.
The largely peaceful wave of protests in Richmond were marked last weekend, however, by confrontations with police, window smashing, graffiti tagging and additional arrests.
City Council voted 7-2 to kill a proposal that would have required the administration to provide information by Oct. 1 on police spending on social services, mental health and other community services and recommendations for moving the money to other departments and private providers that do similar work.
“This proposal is not about demolishing, dismantling or even defunding the police department,” Councilman Michael J. Jones, 9th District, told his council colleagues.
Dr. Jones spearheaded the effort with Councilwoman Stephanie A. Lynch, 5th District, for an analysis of departmental spending.
Dr. Jones said the goal was to allow the administration to lay out where funding for police involved expenditures in social, community and mental health programs covered by other departments and whether the money would be better spent in beefing up the resources of those departments.
“That’s it,” Dr. Jones said before the meeting. “Given our scarce resources, we need to assure our citizens that we are making the best use of our dollars.
“This is something we should be doing, and I don’t understand why just talking about taking a fresh look at police spending is creating such pushback. I’ve received death threats just for talking about this. My family has been harassed.”
But City Council rejected the proposal after Police Chief Gerald M. Smith noted that the headlines and news stories describing the proposal as “defunding police” made it unpalatable.
“Words matter,” Chief Smith told the council. He said the tagline on the proposal sent a message to the police department that there was a “loss of faith and lack of support” for officers at a time when morale is low and officers are overtaxed trying to deal with the continuing demonstrations and regular calls for service.
Chief Smith said he supports the administration and the council spending more on social services, mental health and recreation, but he said it should not come at the expense of the police department.
“I’ll examine our budget head to toe in the spirit of improvement. But first I need to change the misconception that the RPD budget is up for grabs,” he said.
Ahead of the meeting, 2nd District Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Kim B. Gray and 4th District Councilwoman Kristen N. Larson issued a statement rejecting the proposal as a preliminary step to cutting spending on police without clearly spelling out a policy objective.