Calling out white terrorists

3/22/2019, 6 a.m.
An Australian white nationalist who says he hates immigrants acted out his hate by murdering at least 49 people and ...

Julianne Malveaux

An Australian white nationalist who says he hates immigrants acted out his hate by murdering at least 49 people and seriously injuring dozens more last week. He directed his ire at two mosques in the New Zealand city of Christchurch, after posting a hate-filled manifesto that was replete with anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim ranting.


Julianne Malveaux

It is important to know that it was a white man, not a person of color, who perpetrated the most deadly mass shooting in New Zealand. It is essential to call out the white terrorists that too many are too timid to call out by name. They are called nationalists, but when they go on gun-toting rampages, especially in places of worship, this is not nationalism. It is terrorism, plain and simple.

Why are so many people so willing to put adjectives around heinous acts and to describe these terrorists as mentally ill? Why are so many people willing to soft-pedal the abhorrence of these acts?

To his credit, the 45th president did acknowledge the “horrible massacre” in New Zealand, which is much better than he did when Heather Heyer was murdered in Charlottesville and 45 said there were “good people on both sides” of that insanity. The Charlottesville murder of Ms. Heyer is relevant because the man who slaughtered 49 people in New Zealand embraced our president as a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose.

Had 45 a speck of sense, he might have addressed his inclusion in the shooter’s manifesto and condemned it. But how could 45 actually condemn the actions of a white nationalist when, heretofore, he has embraced them, riled them up, supported them and even used the word “nationalist” himself when it has suited him?

The New Zealand terrorist also referenced Dylann Roof in his manifesto. Mr. Roof is the man who has been convicted for his massacre at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, S.C., in 2015. The way that law enforcement chose to coddle Mr. Roof, and the way the media sought to “explain” him, is a textbook case in how white privilege works, even for terrorists.

Upon his arrest, Mr. Roof was taken to get a fast food meal. Perhaps his blood sugar was low and someone hoped to attribute his terrorism to the fact that he may have forgotten to eat. When have you known an African-American perpetrator of anything to be fed before he goes to jail?

There is, of course, a professional courtesy with which law enforcement officials treat white terrorists, while the FBI stirs up anti-black sentiment with their bulletins about “Black Identity Extremists.”

The word terrorist has rarely been applied to Mr. Roof. Instead, he is described as a murderer and white supremacist. But his massacre of nine black people in church was nothing less than terrorism.

But if we call Mr. Roof a terrorist, we must also look at the police who coddled him as terrorist-enablers. We have to look at the media who rushed to explain his background as terrorist-explainers. We have to ask white people why such terrorism is acceptable.